z-logo
Premium
Determination of organic matter in soils by FTIR/diffuse reflectance and multivariate calibration
Author(s) -
Masserschmidt I.,
Cuelbas C. J.,
Poppi R. J.,
de Andrade J. C.,
de Abreu C. A.,
Davanzo C. U.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
journal of chemometrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.47
H-Index - 92
eISSN - 1099-128X
pISSN - 0886-9383
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1099-128x(199905/08)13:3/4<265::aid-cem552>3.0.co;2-e
Subject(s) - normalization (sociology) , partial least squares regression , diffuse reflectance infrared fourier transform , smoothing , multivariate statistics , soil water , calibration , analytical chemistry (journal) , organic matter , chemistry , mathematics , reflectivity , linear regression , diffuse reflection , mineralogy , statistics , soil science , environmental science , environmental chemistry , optics , physics , biochemistry , organic chemistry , photocatalysis , sociology , anthropology , catalysis
A non‐destructive method avoiding the utilization of toxic and corrosive reagents is presented as an alternative for the determination of organic matter (OM) in soils. This method is based on a multivariate calibration procedure using partial least squares (PLS) regression to establish the relationship between the organic matter content in soils determined by conventional chemical measurements and by diffuse reflectance spectra in the mid‐infrared region. The spectra are presented as reflectance ( R ) or log(1/ R ) and in Kubelka–Munk ( K / S ) units. Several data pretreatments such as multiplicative scatter correction (MSC), smoothing, derivation and normalization of the spectral data were employed to improve the performance of the method. The PLS analysis on the data expressed as R and log(1/ R ) after smoothing, differentiation and normalization showed better results, with RMSEPs equal to 0·63% (for R ) and 0·69% (for log(1/ R )) and linear correlation coefficients between reference and predicted OM values equal to 0·981 (for R ) and 0·972 (for log(1/ R )). Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here