Premium
The effect of comparative context on central tendency and variability judgements and the evaluation of group characteristics
Author(s) -
Doosje Bertjan,
Haslam S. Alexander,
Spears Russell,
Oakes Penelope J.,
Koomen Willem
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
european journal of social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.609
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1099-0992
pISSN - 0046-2772
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199803/04)28:2<173::aid-ejsp862>3.0.co;2-z
Subject(s) - psychology , ingroups and outgroups , categorization , judgement , context (archaeology) , social psychology , group (periodic table) , social environment , perception , social group , epistemology , sociology , geography , social science , philosophy , chemistry , archaeology , organic chemistry , neuroscience
A study is reported that examines the effects of comparative context on central tendency and variability judgements of groups, and the evaluation of group characteristics. The central assumption is that these social judgements are not absolute, but depend on the social context in which they are grounded. It is demonstrated that people vary their description of the ingroup in terms of central tendency and group variability as a function of the possibility of comparing the ingroup favourably with other groups in the judgemental task. In a similar vein, it is shown that the evaluation of an ingroup characteristic is not fixed, but depends on its relative favourability within the comparative context. The results of this study clearly demonstrate the importance of comparative context in group perception and are discussed with reference to self‐categorization theory and alternative models of social judgement. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.