Premium
The neglected priority: sexual abuse in the context of residential child care
Author(s) -
Lindsay Meg
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
child abuse review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.569
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1099-0852
pISSN - 0952-9136
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1099-0852(199911/12)8:6<405::aid-car546>3.0.co;2-e
Subject(s) - respite care , context (archaeology) , residential care , sexual abuse , service (business) , medicine , child protection , psychology , day care , psychiatry , nursing , poison control , suicide prevention , environmental health , business , geography , archaeology , marketing
In 1995, a questionnaire was sent to Scotland's residential child care services. Of 89 questions, five concerned sexual abuse. Responses were analysed along several variables—service type, gender and age of residents. A detailed report was compiled (Lindsay, 1997). The response rate was 94% of all Scottish services. The largest group of services were children's homes (112–49%), then residential schools (43–19%), residential respite care (28–12%), care leavers services (16–7%), services for young homeless people (15–7%) and secure units (5–3%), with other service types seven (3%). Two‐thirds of services believed they were caring for children who had been abused and one third for children who had abused others. Where children who had abused others were present, in 91% there were also abused children in the same service. The results were consistent across the variables. In a few cases, allegations of abuse had been made against staff. This was commoner in services for males than females. Staff requested more training and support in their stressful role. These findings have implications for the practice and training of residential staff, management policies and procedure and the design of new services. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.