Premium
Sexual predator evaluations and phrenology: considering issues of evidentiary reliability
Author(s) -
Campbell Terence W.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
behavioral sciences and the law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.649
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1099-0798
pISSN - 0735-3936
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1099-0798(200001/02)18:1<111::aid-bsl382>3.0.co;2-p
Subject(s) - recidivism , risk assessment , reliability (semiconductor) , psychology , poison control , human factors and ergonomics , risk analysis (engineering) , forensic engineering , computer security , computer science , engineering ethics , criminology , engineering , medicine , medical emergency , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics
This article reviews six assessment procedures used for assessing the recidivism risk of previously convicted sexual offenders. The review of these procedures examines whether they comply with generally accepted ethical and practice standards. With few exceptions, most risk assessment instruments fail to comply with these standards. Currently used instruments for risk assessment continue to rely excessively on clinical judgment; and, as a result, they remain at a preliminary stage of development. Consequently, these instruments amount to experimental procedures; and, therefore, they cannot support expert testimony in a legal proceeding. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.