z-logo
Premium
The dangerous nature of intimate relationship stalking: threats, violence, and associated risk factors
Author(s) -
Palarea Russell E.,
Zona Michael A.,
Lane John C.,
LanghinrichsenRohling Jennifer
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
behavioral sciences and the law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.649
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1099-0798
pISSN - 0735-3936
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1099-0798(199907/09)17:3<269::aid-bsl346>3.0.co;2-6
Subject(s) - stalking , suspect , psychology , poison control , domestic violence , injury prevention , criminology , suicide prevention , law enforcement , human factors and ergonomics , social psychology , medicine , medical emergency , political science , law
Although previous studies of forensic and law enforcement stalking populations (Harmon, Rosner, & Owens, 1995; Meloy & Gothard, 1995; Zona, Sharma, & Lane, 1993) agree that the degree of intimacy of the victim–suspect relationship is an important factor in stalking cases, they have not conducted in‐depth analyses of this variable. This study compared 223 intimate ( n =135) and non‐intimate ( n =88) stalking cases managed by the Los Angeles Police Department's Threat Management Unit. A path analysis revealed a significant relationship between the stalkers' intimate versus non‐intimate status and violence committed toward persons and property. This relationship was positively influenced by the suspect's level of proximity to the victim and threats toward the victim and property, but not influenced by suspect's criminal, psychiatric, and domestic violence histories. Overall, intimate relationship stalkers used more dangerous stalking behaviors than non‐intimate relationship stalkers. Risk factors for assessing dangerousness of stalkers are discussed. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here