Premium
Methods of data collection, perceptions of risks and losses, and motivation to give truthful answers to sensitive survey questions
Author(s) -
Rasinski Kenneth A.,
Willis Gordon B.,
Baldwin Alison K.,
Yeh Wenchi,
Lee Lisa
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
applied cognitive psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.719
H-Index - 100
eISSN - 1099-0720
pISSN - 0888-4080
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(199910)13:5<465::aid-acp609>3.0.co;2-y
Subject(s) - psychology , interview , abortion , confidentiality , social psychology , data collection , affect (linguistics) , cognitive interview , perception , sample (material) , applied psychology , survey research , cognition , computer security , psychiatry , statistics , pregnancy , chemistry , mathematics , communication , chromatography , neuroscience , biology , political science , computer science , law , genetics
Two experiments examined survey respondents' concerns about risks and losses when answering sensitive questions in a survey. In Experiment 1 subjects watched one of eight different versions of a videotaped staged interview of a woman being asked about abortion and drunk driving. Experiment 2 was an actual survey interview about women's health issues, including abortion. In Experiment 2, a large proportion of the sample had a recent abortion for which validation information from the clinic was available. Results of both experiments indicate that, when responding to questions about sensitive topics, survey respondents are concerned about risks and losses other than those covered by standard confidentiality assurances and that these other concerns affect truthful reporting. Experiment 1 showed the importance of privacy in surveys of sensitive behaviours. The experiments suggest that under some circumstances interviewer‐administration of sensitive questions may produce data as good as or better than self‐administration. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.