Premium
PEEP‐induced pulmonary vasoconstriction in neonatal piglets: Analysis by pressure‐flow curves
Author(s) -
Venkataraman Shekhar T.,
Allen Jeffrey W.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
pediatric pulmonology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.866
H-Index - 106
eISSN - 1099-0496
pISSN - 8755-6863
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1099-0496(199907)28:1<12::aid-ppul3>3.0.co;2-x
Subject(s) - medicine , pulmonary artery , verapamil , vascular resistance , hemodynamics , cardiology , anesthesia , positive end expiratory pressure , lung , calcium
We analyzed the effect of two levels of positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP: 10 and 15 cm H 2 O) on pulmonary hemodynamics in neonatal piglet lungs isolated in situ and perfused extracorporeally using pulmonary artery pressure‐flow (Pa/Q) relationships. Pulmonary artery pressure (Pa) was measured at flow rates of 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 mL/kg/min. Pa/Q relationship was evaluated by the slope of the Pa/Q plot and the zero‐flow intercept pressure (Pi). Pa/Q relationship with PEEP was studied before and after verapamil. Both levels of PEEP increased the slope of the Pa/Q plot and Pi. PEEP of 15 cm H 2 O resulted in a steeper slope and a higher Pi compared to 10 cm H 2 O of PEEP ( P < 0.05). Verapamil abolished the increase in slope of the pulmonary artery Pa/Q plot but did not affect the increase in Pi with PEEP. The increase in Pi was equal to the increase in mean airway pressure. Verapamil did not affect changes in ventilatory parameters. PEEP increased pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) both by increasing the Pi, which reflects the weighted average of the critical closing pressure, and represents a “Starling resistor” phenomenon, and an increase in the slope of the P‐Q plot, reflecting an increase in pulmonary vascular tone. This response may be unique to the neonatal pulmonary circulation. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1999; 28:12–17. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.