Premium
Differential activities of E2F family members: Unique functions in regulating transcription
Author(s) -
Pierce Angela M.,
SchneiderBroussard Robin,
Philhower Jennifer L.,
Johnson David G.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
molecular carcinogenesis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.254
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1098-2744
pISSN - 0899-1987
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1098-2744(199807)22:3<190::aid-mc7>3.0.co;2-p
Subject(s) - e2f , e2f1 , biology , promoter , transcription factor , repressor , transcription (linguistics) , psychological repression , e box , activator (genetics) , retinoblastoma protein , cyclin dependent kinase , microbiology and biotechnology , genetics , cancer research , gene , gene expression , cell cycle , linguistics , philosophy
Several regulators of E2F transcriptional activity, including the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (Rb) protein, p16 Ink4a , cyclin D1, and cyclin‐dependent kinase 4, have been shown to be targets for genetic alterations that underlie the development of human cancers. Deregulation of E2F transcription factors as a result of these genetic alterations is believed to contribute to tumor development. This hypothesis is supported by the finding that at least some members of the E2F gene family can contribute to oncogenic transformation when overexpressed. Each E2F family member can dimerize with DP proteins, bind consensus E2F sites, and activate transcription. Several pieces of evidence suggest, however, that the various E2F species have unique functions in regulating transcription. We compared the abilities of E2F1, E2F4, and E2F5 to activate transcription from a variety of gene promoters and found that in all cases E2F1 was the most potent activator, followed by E2F4 and then by E2F5. Construction of chimeric proteins between E2F1 and E2F4 demonstrated that either the carboxy terminus or the amino terminus of E2F1 could make E2F4 a more potent activator. In contrast, neither the carboxy terminus nor the amino terminus of E2F1 could significantly increase the activity of E2F5. We found that, consistent with a role for E2F5 in transcriptional repression, E2F5's binding partner p130, like Rb, could also actively repress transcription when directly bound to a target promoter. Mol. Carcinog. 22:190–198, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.