Premium
Optimal foraging theory predicts effects of environmental enrichment in a group of adult golden lion tamarins
Author(s) -
Rapaport Lisa G.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
zoo biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.5
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1098-2361
pISSN - 0733-3188
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1098-2361(1998)17:3<231::aid-zoo6>3.0.co;2-a
Subject(s) - foraging , biology , competition (biology) , optimal foraging theory , zoology , ecology , resource distribution , feeding behavior , resource (disambiguation) , scramble competition , task (project management) , computer network , computer science , management , economics
The success of environmental enrichment programs in effecting specific changes in the behavior of captive animals has not always been uniform. Separate studies demonstrated both an increase in food competition and a decrease in food competition among captive group‐living primates upon introduction of foraging devices. The objectives of this study were to measure the effects of variation in resource distribution and availability on food competition in a group of captive adult golden lion tamarins ( Leontopithecus rosalia ). The resource variables chosen were suggested from optimal foraging theory. The energy invested to obtain an item influenced food transfer and aggressive behaviors while food abundance did not. All individuals obtained an equivalent number of items over the course of the experiment from the foraging device, even though some tamarins obtained most of their food rewards directly from the device while others received their food rewards primarily through food transfer from other group members. Because the monkeys appeared highly motivated to obtain food from the test apparatus and did not habituate to it, the foraging device used in this experiment could be used as regular environmental enrichment for golden lion tamarins. One way to circumvent potentially unacceptable rates of aggression, with this or any feeding protocol that increases foraging task complexity and search time, may be to provide more than one foraging device per group. Zoo Biol 17:231–244, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.