Premium
Optimal volume of processed plasma and total number of selective plasmapheresis sessions in the treatment of patients with severe generalized Myasthenia Gravis
Author(s) -
Yeh JiannHorng,
Chiu HouChang
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
journal of clinical apheresis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.697
H-Index - 46
eISSN - 1098-1101
pISSN - 0733-2459
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1098-1101(1999)14:4<177::aid-jca4>3.0.co;2-l
Subject(s) - plasmapheresis , immunoadsorption , myasthenia gravis , medicine , clearance , titer , plasma clearance , antibody , surgery , gastroenterology , urology , immunology , pharmacokinetics
The selection of the technical parameters of plasmapheresis in the treatment of patients with MG varies widely due to the lack of sufficient data from controlled studies to standardize the plasmapheresis procedure. Eight myasthenia gravis (MG) patients (Osserman IIb and III) received either immunoadsorption plasmapheresis (IA) with a IM‐TR 350 (Asahi Medical Co., Tokyo, Japan) or double filtration plasmapheresis (DF) with a Cascadeflo AC‐1770, with four in each group. A Plasmaflo AP 05 W (Asahi Medical Co., Tokyo, Japan) was used as the plasma separator in both groups. Each course of treatment consisted of five sessions of aphereses on alternate days. Plasma was sampled before and after passing through the column. Samples of plasma were analyzed for acetylcholine receptor antibody (AchRAb) at the start of plasmapheresis and sequentially after every 0.5 L of plasma treated. The IA method cleared significantly more AchRAb during the initial treatment of 1.5 L of plasma than the DF method, especially in the initial 1 L ( P < 0.01). The column saturated after treatment of 1.5 to 2 L of plasma. It is known that over‐saturation of column may release the already adsorbed/filtrated antibodies. Longitudinal analysis on the serological changes during the five sessions revealed that the clearance obtained using the IA method was significantly higher and more sustained after the first session of treatment compared to the DF method ( P < 0.05). The titers of AchRAb were also noted to rise after the fourth session. These results suggest that 2 L of processed volume is optimal in terms of the functional capacity of a plasmapheresis column in either IA or DF methods, and that a total of four sessions of treatment in one course may provide optimal elimination of AchRAb. J. Clin. Apheresis 14:177–180, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.