z-logo
Premium
LTP and spatial learning—Where to next?
Author(s) -
Jeffery Kathryn J.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
hippocampus
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.767
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1098-1063
pISSN - 1050-9631
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1098-1063(1997)7:1<95::aid-hipo10>3.0.co;2-d
Subject(s) - long term potentiation , neuroscience , hippocampus , synaptic plasticity , psychology , metaplasticity , hippocampal formation , associative learning , cognitive psychology , cognitive science , chemistry , biochemistry , receptor
Hebb suggested, in 1949, that memories could be stored by forming associative connections between neurons if the criterion for increasing the connection strength between them be that they were active simultaneously. Much attention has been devoted towards trying to determine a) if there is a physiological substrate of such a rule, and b) if so, whether the phenomenon participates in real‐life memory formation. The discovery of the electrically induced increase in synaptic strength known as long‐term potentiation (LTP), in the early 1970s, demonstrated that a neural version of the Hebb rule could be observed under laboratory conditions in the hippocampus, a structure important for some types of learning. However, a quarter of a century later, the evidence linking LTP to learning and memory is still contradictory. The purpose of the present article is to review and assess the types of approach that have been taken in trying to determine whether hippocampal synaptic plasticity participates in memory formation. Hippocampus 7:95–110, 1997. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here