Open AccessAssessment of vaginal lactobacillary flora in wet mount and fresh or delayed Gram's stain
Author(s) -
Donders Gilbert G.G.,
Vereecken Annie,
Salembier Geert,
Van Bulck Ben,
Spitz Bernard
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
infectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.656
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1098-0997
pISSN - 1064-7449
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1098-0997(1996)4:1<2::aid-idog2>3.0.co;2-5
Subject(s) - gram staining , vaginal flora , flora (microbiology) , vagina , stain , cervix , gram , confidence interval , concordance , medicine , grading (engineering) , biology , pathology , surgery , staining , microbiology and biotechnology , bacteria , antibiotics , ecology , genetics , cancer
Objective The assessment of the vaginal lactobacillary flora helps to direct further diagnostic microbiologic investigations in genital infectious disease and seems to represent a powerful tool in predicting infectious morbidity and preterm labor during pregnancy. In the absence of a “gold standard,” we studied the variations in assessing lactobacillary morphotypes according to the method used. Methods The lactobacillary flora from 183 pregnant women was classified according to 3 groups: normal, intermediate, and abnormal. This grading of lactobacilli was appled to vaginal and cervical specimens by means of 1) immediate wet‐smear microscopy, 2) Gram's stain on a fresh, air‐dried specimen, and 3) delayed Gram's stain after specimen transportation in Stuart's growth medium for 3–6 h. Results The assignment of intermediate or abnormal flora (grade II or grade III) showed high concordance rates among the different preparatory techniques, but the assignment of grade I (normal flora) did not. Fewer lactobacilli were found 2.6 times more often after Gram's stains of fresh specimens [Relative Risk (RR) 2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7–4.1] and 6 times more often when the Gram's stain was performed in a delayed examination after transport than in a fresh wet‐mount specimen (RR 6.2, 95% CI 2.5–15.6). Disturbed lactobacillary grades were also found more frequently in specimens from the cervix than those from the vagina (RR 4.0, 95% (CI, 1.5–10.4). Conclusions There are discrepancies in the diagnosis of lactobacillary grades between gram‐stained and fresh vaginal specimens. The evidence is ambiguous as to which of the 2 methods is responsible. If an evaluation is to be done on a gram‐stained specimen, then the storage of the sample in Stuart transport medium before staining should be avoided. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.