Premium
Alkanol removal from the apolar phase of a two‐liquid phase bioconversion system. Part 1: Comparison of a less volatile and a more volatile in‐situ extraction solvent for the separation of 1‐octanol by distillation
Author(s) -
Mathys Renata G.,
Kut Oemer M.,
Witholt Bernard
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of chemical technology and biotechnology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.64
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1097-4660
pISSN - 0268-2575
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-4660(199804)71:4<315::aid-jctb764>3.0.co;2-2
Subject(s) - chemistry , bioconversion , extraction (chemistry) , downstream processing , distillation , chromatography , liquid–liquid extraction , aqueous two phase system , separation process , solvent , organic chemistry , aqueous solution , fermentation
Abstract Biocatalytic systems can be used for the regio‐ and stereospecific synthesis of oxidized alkanes and aromatic compounds, such as aliphatic and aromatic alcohols, aldehydes and epoxides. These reactions are typically carried out in two‐liquid phase media. The biocatalyst is usually a natural microorganism, often a Pseudomonas , or a genetically altered host, a Pseudomonas or E . coli recombinant typically, which grows in the aqueous phase, while the substrate and product are present in an organic bulk phase. Oxidation products formed in these systems must be purified after separation of the two liquid phases. We have evaluated the performance of distillation for the separation of the product 1‐octanol by examining a more volatile (octane) and a less volatile (hexadecene) in‐situ extraction system. The separation performance of the two systems has been compared based on recovery efficiency, energy cost and number of required process units. Results showed that a less volatile extractant compared favorably in terms of number of product separation unit steps, decreased operating and energy cost to the use of a more volatile extraction solvent. In addition, a major disadvantage of the more volatile in‐situ extraction process was the coloring of the bottom product of the first distillation step, in which the product is contained in this case. Such modifications can be implemented into an upstream and downstream process of bioconversions to improve the overall system and to reduce downstream processing cost. © 1998 SCI