Premium
Entry and distribution of fluorescent antiproliferative heparin derivatives into rat vascular smooth muscle cells: Comparison between heparin‐sensitive and heparin‐resistant cultures
Author(s) -
Bârzu Tereza,
Pascal Marc,
Maman Michel,
Roque Claude,
Lafont Frank,
Rousselet Annie
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
journal of cellular physiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.529
H-Index - 174
eISSN - 1097-4652
pISSN - 0021-9541
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-4652(199604)167:1<8::aid-jcp2>3.0.co;2-t
Subject(s) - heparin , fluorescence microscope , chemistry , endocytosis , internalization , confocal microscopy , biophysics , biochemistry , vascular smooth muscle , cell , fluorescence , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , physics , quantum mechanics , endocrinology , smooth muscle
We studied the binding and entry of fluorescein (FITC)‐labeled heparin derivatives into rat aortic smooth muscle cells (SMC) by confocal microscopy. FITC‐labeled heparin fractions or FITC‐labeled SR 80037A, a potent antiproliferative heparin derivative (Bârzu et al., Eur. J. Pharmacol., 219: 225–233 1992), were prepared and their antiproliferative activity was confirmed. By incubating SMC with FITC‐labeled heparins, a specific cell‐associated fluorescence was found. Cellular fluorescence was mostly located around the nucleus and at the level of cell contacts or cell adhesion. The fluorescence was displaced neither by chasing with excess of unlabeled heparins nor by washing with 1 M NaCl, which proved that labeled heparins had been internalized by SMC. Kinetics of internalization of FITC‐heparins suggested receptor‐mediated endocytosis of heparins by SMC. Double labeling of SMC with biotinylated Concanavalin A and FITC‐SR 80037A also indicated that heparin derivative enters the endocytic pathway. The process was accelerated when serum was present in the incubation medium. Treatment of cells with chloroquine (50 μM) induced accumulation of FITC‐SR 80037A in the late endosomes, around the nucleus. No fluorescence labeling could be evidenced inside the nucleus. Neither electron microscopy nor cell fractionation experiments performed with SMC previously incubated with [ 3 H]‐heparin were able to ascertain nuclear uptake of heparin, as proposed by other workers (Busch et al., Cell Biol., 116: 31–42; 1992; Sing et al., Drug Dev. Res., 29: 129–136 1993). The cell‐associated fluorescence was very weak in SMC resistant to the antiproliferative activity of heparin, selected by long‐term heparin treatment (HT‐SMC) as previously shown [Bârzu et al., J. Cell. Physiol., 160: 239–248, 1994]. The HT‐SMC differed from control SMC with regard to expression of extracellular matrix proteins. These cells exhibited very low expression of fibronectin and prevalent expression of laminin and synthesized less cell‐associated glycosaminoglycans. From our results, the following conclusions can be drawn: (1) the antiproliferative heparins are bound and internalized by SMC without being taken up into the nucleus; (2) there is a correlation between the binding and/or the internalization process and the sensitivity of SMC to the antiproliferative activity of heparins; and (3) selection of heparin‐resistant SMC by long treatment with heparin results in particular growth pattern of SMC (absence of focal overgrowth), associated with changes in the expression of the extracellular matrix components (finbronectin, laminin, and cell‐bound glycosaminoglycans). © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.