Premium
Ternary reactive blends of nylon‐6 matrix with dispersed rigid brittle polymer and elastomer
Author(s) -
Kelnar I.,
Stephan M.,
Jakisch L.,
Fortelný I.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19991107)74:6<1404::aid-app12>3.0.co;2-h
Subject(s) - materials science , elastomer , composite material , toughness , nylon 6 , maleic anhydride , polymer , natural rubber , brittleness , copolymer , ternary operation , stiffness , izod impact strength test , ultimate tensile strength , computer science , programming language
Except by elastomers, the toughness of nylon‐6 (N‐6) can be improved by the addition of rigid poly(styrene‐ co ‐maleic anhydride) (SMA). In this case, strength and stiffness are also enhanced. Combination of SMA with maleated ethylene‐propylene rubber or styrene‐ethene/butene‐styrene with a total content below 15% gives a ternary blend having a toughness level close to elastomer toughening, whereas the strength and stiffness reached at least the Nylon‐6 values. An explanation is a synergistic combination of both elastomer and rigid polymer toughening mechanisms. An opposite effect on mechanical behavior was found with high contents of both additives. Except for worsened strength and stiffness, in some cases, a higher elastomer content even did not enhance the toughness. This effect can be explained by too fine phase structure found, causing the matrix ligament dimension to be below its minimum critical value. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 1404–1411, 1999