Premium
Durable flame‐retardant finished cotton fabrics characterized by thermal degradation behaviors
Author(s) -
Nakanishi Shigeko,
Masuko Fumi,
Hashimoto Toshimasa
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19990207)71:6<975::aid-app13>3.0.co;2-s
Subject(s) - fire retardant , materials science , degradation (telecommunications) , composite material , thermal , polymer science , engineering , physics , meteorology , telecommunications
After a series of investigations on the durable flame‐retardant finishes, it was thought to be important to study these durable flame‐retardant finished materials from the thermal analytical standpoint. Accordingly, cotton fabric was finished with N ‐methylol dialkyl phosphonopropionamide (Pyrovatex C) by thermofixation and tetrakis (hydroxymethyl) phosphonium sulfate (THPS) precondensate by ammonia cure (Proban), as well as with THPS monomer by heat cure under various conditions, and subjected to the thermogravimetry (TG) to observe thermal degradation behaviors and obtain apparent activation energy ( E a ). TG curves of Proban‐finished samples showed the largest shift to lower temperatures with a steep slope; thermofixed THPS‐finished sample gave a smaller shift with similar steep slope, whereas Pyrovatex‐finished samples exhibited a similar shift but with a gradual slope. E a versus residual ratio curves led us to conclude that CN bond‐rich Proban polymer requires the highest E a and decomposes with considerable rapidity, whereas ethylene‐bond‐rich Pyrovatex‐finished samples with melamine crosslinking decompose gradually with the lowest E a . As for the relationship between flame retardance and E a distribution in the process of thermal degradation, typical differences among the above three kinds of finished samples were found, which are compared and discussed. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 71: 975–987, 1999