Premium
Mechanical properties and morphology of impact modified polypropylene–wood flour composites
Author(s) -
Oksman Kristiina,
Clemons Craig
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19980228)67:9<1503::aid-app1>3.0.co;2-h
Subject(s) - materials science , izod impact strength test , composite material , polypropylene , ultimate tensile strength , wood flour , elastomer , epdm rubber , thermoplastic elastomer , compatibilization , composite number , natural rubber , polymer blend , copolymer , polymer
The mechanical properties and morphology of polypropylene/wood flour (PP/WF) composites with different impact modifiers and maleated polypropylene (MAPP) as a compatibilizer have been studied. Two different ethylene/propylene/diene terpolymers (EPDM) and one maleated styrene–ethylene/butylene–styrene triblock copolymer (SEBS–MA) have been used as impact modifiers in the PP/WF systems. All three elastomers increased the impact strength of the PP/WF composites but the addition of maleated EPDM and SEBS gave the greatest improvements in impact strength. Addition of MAPP did not affect the impact properties of the composites but had a positive effect on the composite unnotched impact strength when used together with elastomers. Tensile tests showed that MAPP had a negative effect on the elongation at break and a positive effect on tensile strength. The impact modifiers were found to decrease the stiffness of the composites. Scanning electron microscopy showed that maleated EPDM and SEBS had a stronger affinity for the wood surfaces than did the unmodified EPDM. The maleated elastomers are, therefore, expected to form a flexible interphase around the wood particles giving the composites better impact strength. MAPP further enhanced adhesion between WF and impact‐modified PP systems. EPDM and EPDM–MA rubber domains were homogeneously dispersed in the PP matrix, the diameter of domains being between 0.1–1 μm. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 67:1503–1513, 1998