Premium
Interaction between polybrominated flame retardants and high impact polystyrene
Author(s) -
Radloff D.,
Spiess H. W.,
Books J. T.,
Dowling K. C.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
journal of applied polymer science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.575
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-4628
pISSN - 0021-8995
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19960502)60:5<715::aid-app8>3.0.co;2-t
Subject(s) - polybutadiene , polystyrene , glass transition , materials science , polymer , dynamic mechanical analysis , differential scanning calorimetry , phase (matter) , viscosity , polymer chemistry , chemical engineering , composite material , chemistry , organic chemistry , copolymer , thermodynamics , physics , engineering
Mixtures of two crystalline brominated aromatic flame retardants with a surrounding polymer were studied by differential scanning calormetry, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), wide angle X‐ray scattering, and solid‐state NMR spectroscopy. 1,2‐Bis(tet‐rabromophthalimide)ethane ( I ) and decabromodiphenyloxide ( II ) were evaluated in high impact polystyrene (HIPS). Additive I exhibits all the properties of an inert filler. The crystalline structure with respect to the pure material remains unchanged within the polymer. Concerning the HIPS matrix, a slight rise in the melt viscosity and a reduced impact strenth as compared to the base resin was observed. In contrast, additive II is miscible with the HIPS matrix and dissolves completely. This leads to an increase of the glass transition temperature of the polybutadiene phase as revealed by solid‐state NMR spectroscopy and DMA. The impact resistance of the HIPS matrix is less affected by additive II than by additive I . No interactions were noted with the PS phase at températures up to the glass transition. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.