z-logo
Premium
Kinetics and products of propargyl (C 3 H 3 ) radical self‐reactions and propargyl‐methyl cross‐combination reactions
Author(s) -
Fahr Askar,
Nayak Akshaya
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
international journal of chemical kinetics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.341
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1097-4601
pISSN - 0538-8066
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-4601(2000)32:2<118::aid-kin8>3.0.co;2-f
Subject(s) - propargyl , chemistry , radical , reaction rate constant , propargyl alcohol , medicinal chemistry , photodissociation , free radical reaction , photochemistry , kinetics , organic chemistry , catalysis , physics , quantum mechanics
Propargyl (HCCCH 2 ) and methyl radicals were produced through the 193‐nm excimer laser photolysis of mixtures of C 3 H 3 Cl/He and CH 3 N 2 CH 3 /He, respectively. Gas chromatographic and mass spectrometric (GC/MS) product analyses were employed to characterize and quantify the major reaction products. The rate constants for propargyl radical self‐reactions and propargyl‐methyl cross‐combination reactions were determined through kinetic modeling and comparative rate determination methods. The major products of the propargyl radical combination reaction, at room temperature and total pressure of about 6.7 kPa (50 Torr) consisted of three C 6 H 6 isomers with 1,5‐hexadiyne(CHCCH 2 CH 2 CCH, about 60%); 1,2‐hexadiene‐5yne (CH 2 CCCH 2 CCH, about 25%); and a third isomer of C 6 H 6 (∼15%), which has not yet been, with certainty, identified as being the major products. The rate constant determination in the propargyl‐methyl mixed radical system yielded a value of (4.0 ± 0.4) × 10 −11 cm 3 molecule −1 s −1 for propargyl radical combination reactions and a rate constant of (1.5 ± 0.3) × 10 −10 cm 3 molecule −1 s −1 for propargyl‐methyl cross‐combination reactions. The products of the methyl‐propargyl cross‐combination reactions were two isomers of C 4 H 6 , 1‐butyne (about 60%) and 1,2‐butadiene (about 40%). © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Chem Kinet 32: 118–124, 2000

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here