z-logo
Premium
Preconditioned Krylov subspace methods used in solving two‐dimensional transient two‐phase flows
Author(s) -
Nordsveen Magnus,
Moe Randi
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
international journal for numerical methods in fluids
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.938
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1097-0363
pISSN - 0271-2091
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0363(19991215)31:7<1141::aid-fld916>3.0.co;2-g
Subject(s) - generalized minimal residual method , krylov subspace , solver , mathematics , iterative method , conjugate residual method , biconjugate gradient stabilized method , algebraic equation , linear system , conjugate gradient method , mathematical optimization , computer science , mathematical analysis , physics , gradient descent , nonlinear system , quantum mechanics , machine learning , artificial neural network
This paper investigates the performance of preconditioned Krylov subspace methods used in a previously presented two‐fluid model developed for the simulation of separated and intermittent gas–liquid flows. The two‐fluid model has momentum and mass balances for each phase. The equations comprising this model are solved numerically by applying a two‐step semi‐implicit time integration procedure. A finite difference numerical scheme with a staggered mesh is used. Previously, the resulting linear algebraic equations were solved by a Gaussian band solver. In this study, these algebraic equations are also solved using the generalized minimum residual (GMRES) and the biconjugate gradient stabilized (Bi‐CGSTAB) Krylov subspace iterative methods preconditioned with incomplete LU factorization using the ILUT( p , τ) algorithm. The decrease in the computational time using the iterative solvers instead of the Gaussian band solver is shown to be considerable. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here