Premium
Longitudinal assessment of quality of life in laryngeal cancer patients
Author(s) -
List Marcy A.,
RitterSterr Chris A.,
Baker Theresa M.,
Colangelo Laura A.,
Matz Gregory,
Pauloski Barbara Roa,
Logemann Jeri A.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
head and neck
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.012
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1097-0347
pISSN - 1043-3074
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199601/02)18:1<1::aid-hed1>3.0.co;2-7
Subject(s) - laryngectomy , head and neck cancer , medicine , quality of life (healthcare) , head and neck , radiation therapy , cancer , physical therapy , larynx , surgery , nursing
Background Although quality of life (QL) and performance status are important outcomes in head and neck (HN) cancer, there is little systematic inclusion of these parameters in treatment trials. Methods Rate and recovery of function were evaluated over a 6‐month period in 21 laryngeal cancer patients, 7 in each of 3 treatment groups: total laryngectomy (group 1), hemilaryngectomy (group 2), and radiotherapy only (group 3). Assessment included Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients (PSS‐HN: Diet, Speech, and Eating in Public subscales) and the FACT‐HN, a multidimensional QL measure. Results Groups differed in patterns of performance recovery over time in expected directions. Group 1 recovered most slowly, without achieving normal functioning by 6 months; most of group 2 returned to normal functioning by 3 months; group 3 showed little overall dysfunction. There was no difference in overall QL between groups or over time. Performance status was significantly correlated with the FACT head and neck subscale and somewhat with the Physical subscale. In contrast, ability to eat and/or speak was not associated with overall QL nor with any other specific QL dimension (eg. emotional or social well‐being). Conclusions Results support the sensitivity and applicability of two site‐specific performance/QL measures: PSS‐HN and FACT‐HN. Findings also emphasize the need to employ multidimensional tools to adequately evaluate the nonmedical outcomes in head and neck patients. HEAD & NECK 1996;18:1–10 © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.