Premium
Impact of training on cytotechnologists' interpretation of gynecologic thin‐layer preparations
Author(s) -
Iverson Deanna K.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
diagnostic cytopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.417
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1097-0339
pISSN - 8755-1039
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0339(199803)18:3<230::aid-dc14>3.0.co;2-l
Subject(s) - mcnemar's test , medicine , correlation , test (biology) , significant difference , gynecology , statistics , paleontology , geometry , mathematics , biology
This study determines the impact of training on the accurate interpretation of gynecologic thin‐layer (TL) preparations. A workshop was developed, implemented and evaluated. Training materials were developed with the assistance of a Delphi panel. Sixty‐six self‐selected cytotechnologists participated. The experimental group consisted of 40 participants tested before and after an educational intervention, using gynecologic TL preparations. The 26 individuals in the comparison group were given the same pre‐ and post‐tests as the experimental group, but the educational intervention was not offered until after the tests were administered. Data were analyzed using the t‐test for independent and dependent samples, McNemar's test, point biserial correlation, and descriptive statistics. No significant difference in test scores was observed between the two groups. A correlation was observed between prior exposure to TL preparations and cytotechnologists' test scores. No correlation between experience and test scores was found. Diagn. Cytopathol. 1998;18:230–235. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.