Open AccessFetal nucleated erythrocyte recovery: Fluorescence activated cell sorting‐based positive selection using anti‐gamma globin versus magnetic activated cell sorting using anti‐CD45 depletion and anti‐gamma globin positive selection
Author(s) -
Wang Ji Yi,
Zhen Dong Kai,
Falco Vincent M.,
Farina Antonio,
Zheng Yuen Ling,
DelliBovi L.C.,
Bianchi Diana W.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
cytometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1097-0320
pISSN - 0196-4763
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0320(20000301)39:3<224::aid-cyto8>3.0.co;2-j
Subject(s) - cell sorting , nucleated red blood cell , staining , fluorescence in situ hybridization , fetus , biology , andrology , microbiology and biotechnology , globin , negative selection , blood cell , flow cytometry , immunology , biochemistry , medicine , hemoglobin , pregnancy , chromosome , genetics , genome , gene
BACKGROUND Fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)‐based anti‐gamma (γ) positive selection and magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS)‐based anti‐CD45 depletion followed by anti‐γ positive staining have been two of the most frequently used methods to isolate fetal cells from maternal blood. To date, there has been no direct comparison of fetal cell recovery by these two methods. This study was designed to address this issue. METHODS Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed on nucleated anti‐γ positive cells using X and Y probes. Twenty‐four maternal blood samples were obtained immediately after elective termination of pregnancy to ensure a detectable number of fetal cells. RESULTS The yield and purity of fetal nucleated erythrocytes (FNRBCs) was statistically higher in FACS sorted samples ( P < 0.01). The specificity of staining for FNRBCs was statistically higher in MACS sorted samples ( P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The data from this study demonstrate that both techniques have benefits and limitations. FACS has the advantage of having higher yield, higher purity, higher FISH efficiency and ease in microscope analysis, and MACS has the advantage of having higher specificity and less cell loss during FISH. Cytometry 39:224–230, 2000 © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.