Open AccessAntibiotic susceptibility testing for Chlamydia trachomatis using flow cytometry
Author(s) -
DessusBabus S.,
Belloc F.,
Bébéar C. M.,
Poutiers F.,
Lacombe F.,
Bébéar C.,
de Barbeyrac B.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
cytometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1097-0320
pISSN - 0196-4763
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0320(19980101)31:1<37::aid-cyto5>3.0.co;2-g
Subject(s) - flow cytometry , antibiotics , microbiology and biotechnology , biology
The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two methods of antibiotic susceptibility testing performed on Chlamydia trachomatis ‐infected cells: a flow cytometric detection method and the standard method, which consists of a microscopic reading of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). The L2 reference strain and 13 clinical strains isolated from six patients presenting recurrent infections were tested. McCoy cells infected with an inoculum of 10 5 inclusion forming units (IFU)/ml were incubated with serial dilutions of doxycycline, ofloxacin, and erythromycin. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of cells was determined by flow cytometry after staining of chlamydial inclusions with an anti‐ Chlamydia fluorescent monoclonal antibody. The end‐point values determined by flow cytometry and microscopic reading were equivalent but presented the same imprecision. Calculation of the inhibitory concentration 50 (IC50) by flow cytometry, defined as the antibiotic concentration required to reduce the drug‐free control MFI by 50%, allowed a more objective and precise evaluation of antibiotic activity than MIC. Moreover, IC50 values were reproducible, independent of the antibiotic dilution series tested, and could be used to compare the in vitro efficiency of various drugs on C. trachomatis . No resistant strain was found among the 13 clinical isolates of C. trachomatis tested. Cytometry 31:37–44, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.