Premium
Mixing and phase hold‐ups variations due to gas production in anaerobic fluidized‐bed digesters: Influence on reactor performance
Author(s) -
Buffière Pierre,
Fonade Christian,
Moletta René
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
biotechnology and bioengineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.136
H-Index - 189
eISSN - 1097-0290
pISSN - 0006-3592
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(19981005)60:1<36::aid-bit4>3.0.co;2-1
Subject(s) - residence time distribution , fluidized bed , continuous stirred tank reactor , mixing (physics) , chemistry , plug flow , biogas , bioreactor , chemical engineering , waste management , mechanics , mineralogy , engineering , organic chemistry , inclusion (mineral) , physics , quantum mechanics
The influence of mixing and phase hold‐ups on gas‐producing fluidized‐bed reactors was investigated and compared with an ideal flow reactor performance (CSTR). The liquid flow in the anaerobic fluidized bed reactor could be described by the classical axially dispersed plug flow model according to measurements of residence time distribution. Gas effervescence in the fluidized bed was responsible for bed contraction and for important gas hold‐up, which reduced the contact time between the liquid and the bioparticles. These results were used to support the modeling of large‐scale fluidized‐bed reactors. The biological kinetics were determined on a 180‐L reactor treating wine distillery wastewater where the overall total organic carbon uptake velocity could be described by a Monod model. The outlet concentration and the concentration profile in the reactor appeared to be greatly influenced by hydrodynamic limitations. The biogas effervescence modifies the mixing characteristics and the phase hold‐ups. Bed contraction and gas hold‐up data are reported and correlated with liquid and gas velocities. It is shown that the reactor performance can be affected by 10% to 15%, depending on the mode of operation and recycle ratio used. At high organic loading rates, reactor performance is particularly sensitive to gas effervescence effects. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biotechnol Bioeng 60: 36–43, 1998.