Premium
Lysine production from methanol at 50°C using Bacillus methanolicus: Modeling volume control, lysine concentration, and productivity using a three‐phase continuous simulation
Author(s) -
Lee Grace H.,
Hur Won,
Bremmon Craig E.,
Flickinger Michael C.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
biotechnology and bioengineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.136
H-Index - 189
eISSN - 1097-0290
pISSN - 0006-3592
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0290(19960320)49:6<639::aid-bit5>3.0.co;2-p
Subject(s) - lysine , chemistry , volume (thermodynamics) , fermentation , bioreactor , methanol , biochemistry , industrial fermentation , food science , chromatography , amino acid , organic chemistry , thermodynamics , physics
A simulation was developed based on experimental data obtained in a 14‐L reactor to predict the growth and L ‐lysine accumulation kinetics, and change in volume of a large‐scale (250‐m 3 ) Bacillus methanolicus methanol‐based process. Homoserine auxotrophs of B. methanolicus MGA3 are unique methylotrophs because of the ability to secrete lysine during aerobic growth and threonine starvation at 50°C. Dissolved methanol (100 m M ), pH, dissolved oxygen tension (0.063 atm), and threonine levels were controlled to obtain threonine‐limited conditions and high‐cell density (25 g dry cell weight/L) in a 14‐L reactor. As a fed‐batch process, the additions of neat methanol (fed on demand), threonine, and other nutrients cause the volume of the fermentation to increase and the final lysine concentration to decrease. In addition, water produced as a result of methanol metabolism contributes to the increase in the volume of the reactor. A three‐phase approach was used to predict the rate of change of culture volume based on carbon dioxide production and methanol consumption. This model was used for the evaluation of volume control strategies to optimize lysine productivity. A constant volume reactor process with variable feeding and continuous removal of broth and cells ( VF cstr ) resulted in higher lysine productivity than a fed‐batch process without volume control. This model predicts the variation in productivity of lysine with changes in growth and in specific lysine productivity. Simple modifications of the model allows one to investigate other high‐lysine‐secreting strains with different growth and lysine productivity characteristics. Strain NOA2#13A5‐2 which secretes lysine and other end‐products were modeled using both growth and non‐growth‐associated lysine productivity. A modified version of this model was used to simulate the change in culture volume of another L ‐lysine producing mutant (NOA2#13A52‐8A66) with reduced secretion of end‐products. The modified simulation indicated that growth‐associated production dominates in strain NOA2#13A52‐8A66. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.