Premium
NMR studies of the structure and dynamics of peptide E, an endogenous opioid peptide that binds with high affinity to multiple opioid receptor subtypes
Author(s) -
Yan Chunhua,
Digate Russell J.,
Guiles R. D.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
biopolymers
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.556
H-Index - 125
eISSN - 1097-0282
pISSN - 0006-3525
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0282(199901)49:1<55::aid-bip6>3.0.co;2-a
Subject(s) - chemistry , peptide , opioid peptide , endogeny , receptor , stereochemistry , dynamics (music) , opioid , oligopeptide , opioid receptor , biophysics , biochemistry , physics , acoustics , biology
Structural and dynamic properties of opioid peptide E have been examined in an sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelle. Structural and dynamic studies both indicate that this peptide exhibits greater segmental mobility than typical structured proteins. An nmr structural analysis of adrenal peptide E in SDS micelles indicated the presence of two well‐defined β‐turns, one at the N‐terminus encompassing residues 3 to 6, and the second in the region between residues 15 and 18. Certain side chain dihedral angles were also remarkably well defined, such as the χ 1 angle of F4, which exhibited a trans configuration. These calculated structures were based on a set of 9.5 restraints per residue. The backbone dynamics of peptide E in SDS micelles were examined through an analysis of 15 N‐relaxation parameters. An extended model‐free analysis was used to interpret the relaxation data. The overall rotational correlation time is 19.7 ns. The average order parameter S 2 is 0.66 ± 0.15. The N‐terminal loop region residues including G3 to R6 have an average order parameter of 0.70 ± 0.23. The average order parameter lies somewhere between that observed for a random coil (e.g., S 2 = 0.3) and that of a well‐defined tertiary fold (e.g., S 2 = 0.86). This suggests that peptide E in SDS micelles adopts a restricted range of conformations rather than a random coil. Based on the helical structure recently obtained for the highly homologous κ‐agonist dynorphin‐A(1–17) and the β‐turn in the same region of peptide E, it is reasonable to assume that these two elements of secondary structure reflect different receptor subtype binding geometries. The intermediate order parameters observed for peptide E in an SDS micelle suggest a degree of dynamic mobility that may enable facile interconversion between helical and β‐turn geometries in the N‐terminal agonist domain. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biopoly 49: 55–70, 1999