Premium
Prevalence of elevated blood leads and exposure to lead in construction trades in Iowa and Illinois
Author(s) -
Reynolds Stephen J.,
Seem Rohit,
Fourtes Laurence J.,
Sprince Nancy L.,
Johnson John,
Walkner Laurie,
Clarke William,
Whitten Paul
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
american journal of industrial medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1097-0274
pISSN - 0271-3586
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199908)36:2<307::aid-ajim10>3.0.co;2-v
Subject(s) - medicine , lead (geology) , environmental health , lead exposure , lead poisoning , occupational exposure , gerontology , psychiatry , geology , cats , geomorphology
Background Despite lowering of the permissible exposure level for lead in construction from 200 to 50 μg/m 3 in 1993, excessive lead exposure continues to be a problem. Relatively little data are available from the Midwestern U.S. on the environmental lead concentrations generated during various construction activities and the potential for worker exposure. This study characterized the prevalence of blood lead concentrations in high‐risk construction trades in Iowa/Illinois, and identified risk factors for occupational exposure to lead in these construction workers. Methods A sample of 459 workers was selected from the total population of all union members from trade groups of painters, plumbers/pipefitters, ironworkers, laborers, and electricians. Participants completed an interviewer‐administered questionnaire obtaining information on demographics, symptoms, occupational history, work practices, personal protective equipment, and training. Venous blood samples were collected from each participant and analyzed for blood lead (using atomic absorption spectroscopy) and free erythrocyte protoporphyrin levels. Results Blood lead levels (BLLs) of construction workers ranged from 0.1 to 50 μg/dL. Geometric mean blood lead concentrations by trade group were: laborers (7.6 μg/dL, n = 80); painters (5.9 μg/dL, n = 83); ironworkers (5.2 μg/dL, n = 87); plumbers (4.4 μg/dL, n = 82); electricians (2.4 μg/dL, n = 91). Blood lead levels for painters and laborers were significantly higher than other trade groups, and levels for electricians were significantly lower (p < 0.01). Participants reported working primarily on commercial and industrial projects including new construction, renovation, and demolition. There were significant differences between the types of projects performed by different trade groups with laborers performing more highway/bridge renovation (p < 0.01), and plumbers reporting more residential remodeling (p = 0.05), repair of water lines containing lead (p = 0.04), or work on lead joints (p < 0.01). In addition to trade, elevated blood lead levels were associated with the type of construction project (especially bridge renovation and residential remodeling) and activities that include welding, cutting, rivet busting. The age of the home in which the worker lived, and hobbies such as casting/smelting lead for bullets or sinkers, were also important risk factors. Compliance with OSHA's Construction Lead Standard, and implementation of good occupational health and safety practices in general, was poor. Conclusions Blood lead levels of 459 construction workers differed by the type of trade, type of project and specific job activity owing to differences in the inherent exposure potential of each task. Although the numbers of workers performing lead abatement projects were small, the trend for lower BLL in this group provides evidence that training, implementation of engineering controls, and proper use of personal protective equipment such as respirators is effective in controlling lead poisoning. Am. J. Ind. Med. 36:307–316, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.