z-logo
Premium
Issues and findings in the evaluation of occupational risk among women high nickel alloys workers
Author(s) -
Arena Vincent C.,
Costantino Joseph P.,
Sussman Nancy B.,
Redmond Carol K.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
american journal of industrial medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1097-0274
pISSN - 0271-3586
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199907)36:1<114::aid-ajim16>3.0.co;2-v
Subject(s) - medicine , cohort , demography , standardized mortality ratio , population , cohort study , relative risk , occupational medicine , gerontology , environmental health , confidence interval , occupational exposure , sociology
Background: We present the mortality experience for a cohort of women (n = 2,877) from a large epidemiologic study of production and fabrication high nickel alloys workers (n = 31,165). All the plants were located within the United States and cohort eligibility required some work experience within the period of the late 1940s through the mid 1960s. Methods: Vital status follow‐up was through the end of 1988 and incorporated information from multiple sources. Cause‐specific mortality was evaluated by comparing cohort mortality to the general United States female population and to local populations in geographic proximity to the plants. Relative risk estimates were determined for 62 cause of death categories using the Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) and were adjusted for age, race, gender, and calendar time by the indirect method using a modified life table technique. Results: Relative risks for all causes (0.98), all cancers (0.90), lung cancer (1.34), and breast cancer (0.96) were nonsignificant when mortality was compared to the US female population. No relationship between mortality and length of time employed in the industry or work area was identified. Discussion: Although there were some difficulties in tracing women due to name changes, comprehensive follow‐up was obtained when using multiple sources of information. Our strategy resulted in resolving vital status for over 95% of the women, which is comparable to that of the male cohort. The type of jobs and work activities differed between genders. Females were employed predominantly in two work areas (allocated services, 87%, and grinding, 46%), whereas males were employed in several work areas (allocated services, 76%, grinding, 27%, hot working, 20%, and cold working, 17%). Considerable variation was noted among the study plants with respect to the percent of female production workers in the workforce. Generally, the patterns of relative risks derived for the total cohort and various subgroups are similar across the different comparison populations. Estimated elevated risks are usually lower when cohort mortality is compared to that of local populations. No increased risks were identified for any site‐specific cancers or nonmalignant causes of death. Am. J. Ind. Med. 36:114–121, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here