z-logo
Premium
Alternative approaches for measuring duration of work disability after low back injury based on administrative workers' compensation data
Author(s) -
Krause Niklas,
Dasinger Lisa K.,
Deegan Leo J.,
Brand Richard J.,
Rudolph Linda
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
american journal of industrial medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1097-0274
pISSN - 0271-3586
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199906)35:6<604::aid-ajim8>3.0.co;2-t
Subject(s) - medicine , duration (music) , rehabilitation , workers' compensation , disability pension , disability benefits , wage , physical therapy , work (physics) , compensation (psychology) , cohort , cohort study , low back pain , physical medicine and rehabilitation , social security , environmental health , labour economics , psychology , population , alternative medicine , art , psychoanalysis , law , literature , pathology , engineering , political science , mechanical engineering , economics
Background Studies of low back pain (LBP) disability remain largely incomparable because of different outcome definitions. To date, systematic comparisons of alternative outcome measures have not been made. Methods Duration of work disability was studied in a 3‐year cohort of 850 workers' compensation LBP claimants. Eleven administrative outcome measures were compared using Kaplan‐Meier estimates of the proportion of claimants still on disability benefits during 3.5 years of follow‐up. Results The estimated mean duration of work disability was 75 days for the first temporary disability (TD) episode, 108 days for cumulative time on TD, and 337 for total compensated days, which includes all types of wage replacement benefits during vocational rehabilitation, temporary and permanent disability. Conclusions Commonly used administrative measures of lost workdays—time to first return to work and time on temporary disability—substantially underestimate the duration of work disability compared to measures based on all wage replacement benefits. Am. J. Ind. Med. 35:604–618, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here