Premium
Asbestos plaques in a typical veteran's hospital population
Author(s) -
Miller Jeffrey A.,
Zurlo John V.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
american journal of industrial medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1097-0274
pISSN - 0271-3586
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199612)30:6<726::aid-ajim9>3.0.co;2-o
Subject(s) - medicine , asbestos , population , environmental health , occupational exposure , emergency medicine , medical emergency , metallurgy , materials science
Previous authors have described several pleural abnormalities on chest radiography as being pathognomonic for asbestos exposure. We sought to determine the percentage of admissions and outpatients at a typical Veteran's Affairs hospital with these findings, and researched medical records to verify the frequency at which patients having positive radiographs were suspected either by clinical/occupational history or radiologically to have had prior significant exposure to asbestos. Radiographs of 1,212 consecutive patients were evaluated by a certified B reader, and the medical records as well as previous radiology reports of all positive patients were reviewed. Twenty‐eight (2.3%) of the radiographs had pleural abnormalities consistent with asbestos exposure, with the patients, all male, ranging in age from 50 to 98 years (mean 75.6). Radiology reports described pleural plaques in only 12 of the 21 (57%) cases with prior exams available; in only seven (33%) was an asbestos etiology considered by the interpreting radiologist. The plaques were misdiagnosed in four instances as being indicative of other, unrelated pathology. A history of known dust exposure was expressed by only five patients (18%). Eleven described working in occupations now known to have a high incidence of exposure, but neither patient nor examining physician expressed consideration of dust inhalation. In conclusion, we have found that a significant percentage of patients in certain subpopulations show radiographic evidence of asbestos exposure that may be a harbinger of related pathology. Unfortunately, because of a low index of suspicion, thorough environmental histories are often deferred, many radiographic changes are either not recognized or are misdiagnosed, and these patients are not followed with the stringent protocols they deserve. © 1996 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.