Premium
Multilayered shell finite element with interlaminar continuous shear stresses: a refinement of the Reissner–Mindlin formulation
Author(s) -
Brank Boštjan,
Carrera Erasmo
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
international journal for numerical methods in engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.421
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1097-0207
pISSN - 0029-5981
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0207(20000630)48:6<843::aid-nme903>3.0.co;2-e
Subject(s) - stress resultants , finite element method , variational principle , displacement field , transverse shear , mathematical analysis , shear (geology) , transverse plane , calculus of variations , shell (structure) , mathematics , stress field , shear stress , mixed finite element method , constitutive equation , geometry , mechanics , physics , structural engineering , materials science , engineering , composite material
A finite element formulation for refined linear analysis of multilayered shell structures of moderate thickness is presented. An underlying shell model is a direct extension of the first‐order shear‐deformation theory of Reissner–Mindlin type. A refined theory with seven unknown kinematic fields is developed: (i) by introducing an assumption of a zig‐zag (i.e. layer‐wise linear) variation of displacement field through the thickness, and (ii) by assuming an independent transverse shear stress fields in each layer in the framework of Reissner's mixed variational principle. The introduced transverse shear stress unknowns are eliminated on the cross‐section level. At this process, the interlaminar equilibrium conditions (i.e. the interlaminar shear stress continuity conditions) are imposed. As a result, the weak form of constitutive equations (the so‐called weak form of Hooke's law) is obtained for the transverse strains–transverse stress resultants relation. A finite element approximation is based on the four‐noded isoparametric element. To eliminate the shear locking effect, the assumed strain variational concept is used. Performance of the derived finite element is illustrated with some numerical examples. The results are compared with the exact three‐dimensional solutions, as well as with the analytical and numerical solutions obtained by the classical, the first‐order and some representative refined models. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.