Premium
On using different recovery procedures for the construction of smoothed stress in finite element method
Author(s) -
Lo S. H.,
Lee C. K.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
international journal for numerical methods in engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.421
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1097-0207
pISSN - 0029-5981
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0207(19981215)43:7<1223::aid-nme466>3.0.co;2-k
Subject(s) - superconvergence , stress field , finite element method , stress (linguistics) , matrix (chemical analysis) , mathematics , polynomial , field (mathematics) , calculus (dental) , mathematical optimization , algorithm , structural engineering , mathematical analysis , engineering , materials science , pure mathematics , medicine , philosophy , linguistics , dentistry , composite material
The performance of three different stress recovery procedures, namely, the superconvergent patch recovery technique (SPR), the recovery by equilibrium in patches (REP) and a combined method known as the LP procedure is reviewed. Different order of polynomials and various patch formation strategies have been employed in the numerical studies for the construction of smoothed stress fields. Two 2‐D elastostatic problems of different characteristics are used to assess the behaviour of the stress recovery procedures. The numerical results obtained indicate that when the order of polynomial used in the recovery procedure is equal to that of the finite element analysis, the behaviours of all three recovery procedures are very similar and all of them are adequate to provide a reliable recovered stress field for error estimation. In case that the order of polynomial of the recovered stress is increased, the LP procedure seems to give a more stable recovery matrix and a more reliable recovered stress field than the REP procedure. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.