z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
fMRI of visual encoding: Reproducibility of activation
Author(s) -
Machielsen Willem C.M.,
Rombouts Serge A.R.B.,
Barkhof Frederik,
Scheltens Philip,
Witter Menno P.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
human brain mapping
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.005
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1097-0193
pISSN - 1065-9471
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(200003)9:3<156::aid-hbm4>3.0.co;2-q
Subject(s) - reproducibility , voxel , psychology , audiology , neuroscience , cognition , hippocampal formation , medicine , chemistry , radiology , chromatography
fMRI, a noninvasive technique to measure brain activation, is gaining clinical interest, because its sensitivity enables individual assessments. However, more insight in the reproducibility of these measurements during higher cognitive tasks is necessary. We performed an fMRI study involving within‐ and between‐subject reproducibility during encoding of complex visual pictures. Ten healthy subjects were studied on three occasions: twice in the same scanning session (study 1 and 2), and a third time, 3–24 days later (study 3). On all 30 occasions but one, activation was found in areas expected on the basis of previous studies, including the fusiform and lingual gyri, occipital and parietal areas, the (para)hippocampal area, and the frontal inferior sulcus. The reproducibility of the number of activated voxels in the whole brain was 72% and 63% (respectively, studies 1 and 2, and 1 and 3). The reproducibility of anatomical identical pixels that supplement these results was 49% and 36%. These reproducibility measures increase about 5–15% when only areas of expected activation are included. The quantitative measurements indicate that there is substantial variation in the volume of activation. The recognition of pictures as tested afterward explains part of this variation between subjects. Our findings indicate that whereas consistent patterns of activation exist, more insight is needed into what determines the volume of activation, especially to assess cognitive alterations in patients over time. Hum. Brain Mapping 9:156–164, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here