z-logo
Premium
Expression of chick Barx‐1 and its differential regulation by FGF‐8 and BMP signaling in the maxillary primordia
Author(s) -
Barlow Amanda J.,
Bogardi JeanPhilippe,
Ladher Raj,
FrancisWest Philippa H.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
developmental dynamics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.634
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1097-0177
pISSN - 1058-8388
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0177(199904)214:4<291::aid-aja2>3.0.co;2-e
Subject(s) - primordium , biology , fibroblast growth factor , differential (mechanical device) , microbiology and biotechnology , bone morphogenetic protein , bone morphogenetic protein 2 , expression (computer science) , anatomy , genetics , gene , receptor , computer science , engineering , in vitro , programming language , aerospace engineering
The vertebrate face develops from a series of primordia surrounding the primitive mouth and is thought to be patterned by the differential expression of homeobox‐containing genes. Here we describe the isolation of the chick homologue of the homeobox‐containing gene, Barx‐1 , and show its expression in the developing facial primordia, stomach, and appendicular skeleton. In the maxillary primordia, mesenchymal expression of Barx‐1 is complementary to that of Msx‐1 , which correlate with overlying epithelial expression of Fgf‐8 and Bmp‐4 , respectively. We show that epithelial signals are required to maintain Barx‐1 expression and that FGF‐8 can substitute for the epithelium. By contrast, BMPs reduce Barx‐1 expression and can antagonize FGF‐8 signaling. This suggests that in vivo, FGF‐8/BMP signaling may regulate Barx‐1 gene expression. This provides evidence that the differential expression of FGF‐8 and BMPs may determine homeobox‐containing gene expression and hence patterning of the facial primordia. Dev Dyn 1999;214:291–302 . © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here