Overall survival of the medical oncologist

BACKGROUND Changing patterns of patient referral, decreasing payments for service provision, confusing network participation and reimbursement, as well as challenges to autonomous clinical decision‐making jeopardize the traditional role of the oncologist in delivering cancer care. The cancer patient also may be at risk with unproven cancer delivery systems that displace the oncologist as decision‐maker and care provider. The authors have constructed a model that preserves the oncologist's clinical and financial autonomy while meeting marketplace demands for improved access, decreasing costs and preserved quality of care. METHODS During a 4‐year period, a group of private practice medical oncologists initiated a formal business plan to evaluate marketplace needs, then designed and implemented a novel cancer care delivery model. The model required reconfiguring the practice into an integrated Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations‐certified cancer service corporation, providing medical, radiation, and gynecologic oncology. Palliative care, pain management, psychologic, and nutritional services were instituted as well as the vertical integration of home health and hospice care. Clinical pathways and treatment protocols were designed to enhance patient care and facilitate cost‐of‐care projections in designated populations using a cancer incidence forecasting model. Outcomes analysis are performed as part of ongoing continuous quality improvement, which continues to change this health care delivery system. RESULTS In the 3 years since implementation of the model, the practice has increased from 16 to 24 physicians, and the number of offices has increased from 12 to 17. Patient encounters, both new and established, have doubled. Cost of services, specifically hospitalization, have been reduced by 50%. Clinical research referrals have increased 300%. Physician compensation has improved >20%. CONCLUSIONS The model created a low cost, high value provider not burdened by allocated overhead. Decentralized care enhanced community access, which improved patient compliance, enhanced patient satisfaction, decreased hospitalization, and thereby decreased cost. The horizontal structure permited the flexibility for varied purchaser products and politically sensitive physician and hospital provider panels. Consensus‐based protocol and pathway determination achieved maximum physician participation, which preserved clinical and financial autonomy, decreased variance, and facilitated clinical research. Cancer 1998;82:2047‐56. © 1998 American Cancer Society.