z-logo
Premium
Watchful waiting or watchful progression?
Author(s) -
McLaren Duncan B.,
McKenzie Michael,
Duncan Graeme,
Pickles Tom
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980115)82:2<349::aid-cncr15>3.0.co;2-z
Subject(s) - watchful waiting , medicine , prostate cancer , prostate specific antigen , population , stage (stratigraphy) , surgery , prostate , adenocarcinoma , cancer , paleontology , environmental health , biology
BACKGROUND Prostate specific antigen doubling time (PSAdt) is a dynamic model of prostate tumor biology. It predicts aggressive disease and subsequent clinical recurrence after radical treatment. However, as yet there is only limited evidence for its validity in the watchful waiting population. METHODS One hundred and thirteen previously untreated patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate who were referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency for a management opinion subsequently were placed into a prospective watchful waiting program. The reasons for watchful waiting, previous medical history, serial PSA, and histopathologic data were recorded. RESULTS The median age of patients was 75 years (range, 49‐85 years). The median follow‐up from the time of the first appointment was 14 months (range, 0‐58 months). The reasons for watchful waiting were correlated highly with T classification ( P = 0.003) and past medical history ( P = 0.002). Approximately 40% of T1 patients and 51% of T2 patients had clinical progression by 2 years, increasing to 60% at 3 years. On multivariate analysis PSAdt strongly correlated with clinical progression ( P < 0.0001), stage progression ( P = 0.01), and time to treatment ( P = 0.0001); tumor grade and initial stage were not found to be predictive for any of the endpoints studied. Initial PSA only was significant in predicting for time to treatment ( P = 0.03). Approximately 50% of patients with a PSAdt of <18 months progressed within 6 months. At last follow‐up, no deaths from prostate carcinoma had been recorded. Overall survival at 2 and 5 years was 92% and 68%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Using digital rectal examination, the findings of this study demonstrated high rates of clinical tumor progression within the watchful waiting population. PSAdt rather than standard histopathologic criteria was found to be the most powerful indicator of disease activity. Cancer 1998;82:342‐8. © 1998 American Cancer Society.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here