Premium
Update on the profile of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2a RET mutations
Author(s) -
Decker Ruth A.,
Peacock Michael L.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970801)80:3+<557::aid-cncr5>3.0.co;2-6
Subject(s) - medicine , multiple endocrine neoplasia , multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 , endocrine system , mutation , genetics , germline mutation , gene , hormone , biology
BACKGROUND The RET protooncogene is responsible for the inherited cancer syndromes multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2a (MEN 2a) and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma (FMTC). Identification of predisposing germline RET mutations has allowed a DNA‐based approach to diagnosis. Despite known mutational occurrences in RET exons 10,11,13, and 14, the majority of national diagnostic laboratories, with rare exception, continue to limit genetic analysis for MEN 2a and FMTC to RET exons 10 and 11. This study was undertaken to examine the genotype pattern of germline MEN 2a/FMTC RET mutations in an ethnically diverse North American population and assess the sensitivity of a more comprehensive testing approach to mutation detection that encompassed RET exons 10, 11, 13, and 14. METHODS The study group was comprised of 414 unselected consecutive patients at risk for hereditary MTC referred to a single laboratory. Genetic analysis used genomic DNA and a polymerase chain reaction‐based denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis strategy for mutation detection in exons 10, 11, 13, and 14. RESULTS Thirty‐five distinct MEN 2a or FMTC kindreds were identified. Thirteen different missense germline mutations were detected in 29 of the 35 families at RET codons 609, 618, 620, and 634 within exons 10 (31.4%) and 11 (51.4%). Of the 18 families with an exon 11 mutation, 12 (66.7%) harbored the most common TGC→CGC missense change at codon 634. Four families (11.4%) harbored a codon 804 mutation in exon 14. Two of the codon 804 mutations uncovered were novel (GTG→ATG and GTG→CTG) and occurred in three of the four families. Germline mutations were not observed in exon 13. A RET sequence abnormality remained undetected in two families with established multigenerational MTC. Hirschsprung's disease cosegregated in five families with MEN 2a. CONCLUSIONS The sensitivity of genetic screening for MEN 2a offered by diagnostic laboratories that limit RET analysis to exons 10 and 11 is 82.8%. Genetic testing that includes RET exon 14 results in a more complete and accurate analysis with a sensitivity approaching 95%. The authors recommend that clinicians confirm the comprehensiveness of a laboratory's genetic screening approach for MEN 2a to ensure thoroughness of sample analysis. Cancer 1997; 80:557‐68. © 1997 American Cancer Society