Premium
The rate‐limiting step in the folding of the cis ‐Pro167Thr mutant of TEM‐1 β‐lactamase is the trans to cis isomerization of a non‐proline peptide bond
Author(s) -
Vanhove Marc,
Raquet Xavier,
Palzkill Timothy,
Pain Roger H.,
Frère JeanMarie
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
proteins: structure, function, and bioinformatics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.699
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1097-0134
pISSN - 0887-3585
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(199605)25:1<104::aid-prot8>3.0.co;2-j
Subject(s) - guanidine , chemistry , mutant , isomerization , protein folding , kinetics , native state , folding (dsp implementation) , stereochemistry , peptide bond , peptide , enzyme , protein engineering , crystallography , biophysics , biochemistry , catalysis , biology , physics , quantum mechanics , electrical engineering , gene , engineering
Abstract The stability and kinetics of unfolding and refolding of the P167T mutant of the TEM‐1 β‐lactamase have been investigated as a function of guanidine hydrochloride concentration. The activity of the mutant enzyme was not significantly modified, which strongly suggests that the Glu166–Thr167 peptide bond, like the Glu166–Pro167, is cis . The mutation, however, led to a significant decrease in the stability of the native state relative to both the thermodynamically stable intermediate and the fully unfolded state of the protein. In contrast to the two slower phases seen in the refolding of the wild‐type enzyme, only one phase was detected in the refolding of the mutant, indicating a determining role of proline 167 in the kinetics of folding of the wild‐type enzyme. The former phases are replaced by rapid refolding when the enzyme is unfolded for short periods of time, but the latter is independent of the time of unfolding. The monophasic refolding reaction of the mutant is proposed to reflect mainly the trans → cis isomerization of the Glu166–Thr167 peptide bond. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.