z-logo
Premium
Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of single umbilical artery
Author(s) -
Wu MengHsing,
Chang FongMing,
Shen MengRu,
Yao BorLin,
Chang ChiungHsin,
Yu ChenHsiang,
Hsu ChaoChin,
Huang KoEn
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
journal of clinical ultrasound
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.272
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1097-0096
pISSN - 0091-2751
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0096(199710)25:8<425::aid-jcu3>3.0.co;2-l
Subject(s) - single umbilical artery , medicine , umbilical artery , fetus , prenatal diagnosis , umbilical vein , abnormality , ultrasound , vein , pregnancy , obstetrics , radiology , biochemistry , genetics , chemistry , psychiatry , in vitro , biology
Purpose We evaluated the reliability of prenatal sonography and the usefulness of the umbilical vein and artery diameter ratio, transverse umbilical artery diameter, and systolic‐diastolic ratio in detecting single umbilical artery (SUA). Methods In 24 of 6,970 fetuses, SUA was detected using prenatal sonography and confirmed at birth. These cases were retrospectively reviewed. Results Four fetuses had major malformations, and 1 had a minor anomaly. Thirteen fetuses with SUA underwent chromosomal analysis, and only 2 had abnormal karyotypes. Most of the SUA fetuses had a normal systolic‐diastolic ratio. Conclusions Our retrospective study determined that the prognosis of SUA fetuses is good when there is no concurrent anatomic or chromosomal abnormality. Although some reports claim that the transverse umbilical artery diameter or the ratio between umbilical vein and artery diameters can predict SUA, we found no significant improvement in the recognition of SUA using these parameters. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound 25 : 425–430, 1997.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here