Premium
PROSPECTS AND PROBLEMS FOR MULTI‐SEASONAL PREDICTIONS: SOME ISSUES ARISING FROM A STUDY OF 1992
Author(s) -
HUNT B. G.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
international journal of climatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.58
H-Index - 166
eISSN - 1097-0088
pISSN - 0899-8418
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1097-0088(199702)17:2<137::aid-joc110>3.0.co;2-5
Subject(s) - climatology , environmental science , latitude , climate model , sea surface temperature , variable (mathematics) , meteorology , climate change , geology , mathematics , geography , oceanography , mathematical analysis , geodesy
Global climatic predictions for 12 months in advance have been made for 1992. A two‐phased model approach was used. The first phase was the generation of predicted sea‐surface temperature anomalies for the low‐ latitude Pacific Ocean obtained from the Cane and Zebiak coupled model. The second phase involved superimposing these anomalies upon the climatological sea‐surface temperatures used in a global climatic model in order to force climatic perturbations unique to 1992. The differences between the outputs of this model and the same model run with climatological sea‐surface temperatures permit identification of possible climatic changes for 1992. An ensemble approach was used involving 10 runs each of 1 year's duration for both climatological and perturbed conditions. This procedure was used to allow for chaotic influences to be included in the model outputs. Such influences in the model arise from the divergence of forecast projections in phase space rather than being attributable to stochastic processes. The impact of chaos on the predictions is illustrated in a number of cases. A succinct summary of the predictive skill for rainfall anomalies, probably the most difficult climatic variable to predict satisfactorily, is provided. A number of regional situations is examined in some detail to indicate the potential skill that exists with this two‐phased approach for situations of both above and below average rainfall. Some noticeable failures also occurred that were attributed to the underlying climatology of the global climatic model being inadequate, rather than to a deficiency in the technique. As would be expected from the limited oceanic region for which sea‐surface temperature anomalies were predicted, the climatic predictions were restricted basically to areas influenced by ENSO events. Although there is room for considerable improvements in the results presented here, the two‐phased technique represents a viable, simple, and relatively economic interim method for generating multi‐seasonal predicti ons for the immediate future. © 1997 by the Royal Meteorological Society.