z-logo
Premium
Stereospecific Ion–Molecule Reactions of Nucleophilic Gas‐phase Reagents with Protonated Bifunctional Tetracyclic Terpene Epimers in the Triple Quadrupole Collision Cell
Author(s) -
Cole Richard B.,
Tabet JeanClaude
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
journal of mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.475
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1096-9888
pISSN - 1076-5174
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1096-9888(199704)32:4<413::aid-jms496>3.0.co;2-c
Subject(s) - chemistry , nucleophile , proton affinity , stereospecificity , protonation , reagent , triple quadrupole mass spectrometer , terpene , medicinal chemistry , computational chemistry , stereochemistry , organic chemistry , photochemistry , mass spectrometry , ion , tandem mass spectrometry , selected reaction monitoring , chromatography , catalysis
Various nucleophilic reagents (methanol, acetone, ammonia and trimethylamine), characterized by different proton affinities, were introduced into the collision cell of the triple quadrupole as reactive gases for collisionally activated reaction (CAR) studies on stereoisomeric tetracyclic terpenes containing acetal and cyclobutanol functions. Under low‐energy ( E lab ∽3 eV) and multiple collision conditions, proton transfer from protonated terpenes (MH + , selected by the first quadrupole) to the reagent gas was observed in each case, at varying efficiencies. At the same time, collision‐induced decompositions (CIDs) were observed as competing processes in each tandem mass spectrum. For methanol, the reaction gas having the lowest proton affinity, CID processes were heavily favored, whereas CAR processes dominated only for trimethylamine (highest proton affinity) reacting with the exo terpene epimer. The latter reagent gas receives the proton in an exothermic transfer which is strikingly stereospecific. The underlying stereochemical effect is attributed not only to proton affinity differences which favor transfer from the exo epimer, but also to steric and kinetic factors which are evidently highly unfavorable for the endo configuration. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here