Premium
Distribution of input and output synapses on the central branches of bushcricket and cricket auditory afferent neurones: Immunocytochemical evidence for GABA and glutamate in different populations of presynaptic boutons
Author(s) -
Hardt M.,
Watson A.H.D.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
journal of comparative neurology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.855
H-Index - 209
eISSN - 1096-9861
pISSN - 0021-9967
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19990118)403:3<281::aid-cne1>3.0.co;2-0
Subject(s) - biology , immunocytochemistry , neuroscience , glutamate receptor , context (archaeology) , immunogold labelling , horseradish peroxidase , synapse , gabaergic , anatomy , inhibitory postsynaptic potential , ultrastructure , biochemistry , paleontology , receptor , enzyme , endocrinology
In order to investigate the synapses on the terminals of primary auditory afferents in the bushcricket and cricket, these were impaled with microelectrodes and after physiological characterisation, injected intracellularly with horseradish peroxidase. The tissue was prepared for electron microscopy, and immunocytochemistry for γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate was carried out on ultrathin sections by using a post‐embedding immunogold technique. The afferent terminals received many input synapses. Between 60–65% of these were made by processes immunoreactive for GABA and approximately 25% from processes immunoreactive for glutamate. The relative distribution of the different classes of input were analysed from serial section reconstruction of terminal afferent branches. Inputs from GABA and glutamate‐immunoreactive processes appeared to be scattered at random over the terminal arborisation of the afferents both with respect to each other and to the architecture of the terminals. They were, however, always found close to the output synapses. The possible roles of presynaptic inhibition in the auditory afferents is discussed in the context of the auditory responses of the animals. J. Comp. Neurol. 403:281–294, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.