z-logo
Premium
Variation in axillary node dissection influences the degree of nodal involvement in breast cancer patients
Author(s) -
Saha Sanjoy,
Farrar William B.,
Young Donn C.,
Ferrara John J.,
Burak William E.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of surgical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.201
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1096-9098
pISSN - 0022-4790
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(200003)73:3<134::aid-jso4>3.0.co;2-f
Subject(s) - medicine , breast cancer , axillary lymph node dissection , dissection (medical) , lymph node , axilla , axillary dissection , chemotherapy , cancer , surgery , mastectomy , sentinel lymph node
Background and Objectives The number of positive axillary lymph nodes predicts prognosis and is often important in determining adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. This study was undertaken to determine if differences in the extent of axillary node dissection would alter the number of reported positive nodes. Methods The study population consisted of 302 patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent complete (level I/II/III) axillary lymph node dissection. Assuming that all patients had undergone a level I/II dissection, it was determined how frequently a patient's nodal category (0, 1–3, 4–9, >10 positive nodes) would have been altered if a level I or level I/II/III dissection were performed. Results Assuming that all 302 patients had undergone a level I/II dissection, performing only level I dissection would have resulted in a change in nodal category in 15.9% of all patients and 36.1% of patients with positive nodes. The corresponding changes for a level I/II/III dissection would have been 4.3% and 9.5%, respectively. Conclusions Variations in the level of axillary node dissection for breast cancer can result in significant changes in the number of positive axillary nodes. This can potentially bias adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations if treatment decisions are based on this prognostic factor. J. Surg. Oncol. 2000;73:134–137 . © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here