Premium
Tumor spread and outcome of treatment in primary esophageal small cell carcinoma
Author(s) -
Nishimaki Tadashi,
Suzuki Tsutomu,
Nakagawa Satoru,
Watanabe Kazuo,
Aizawa Kikuo,
Hatakeyama Katsuyoshi
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
journal of surgical oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.201
H-Index - 111
eISSN - 1096-9098
pISSN - 0022-4790
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1096-9098(199702)64:2<130::aid-jso8>3.0.co;2-c
Subject(s) - medicine , esophagectomy , esophagus , carcinoma , lymph node , survival rate , surgery , esophageal disease , esophageal cancer , gastroenterology , cancer
Background The most effective treatment for patients with esophageal small cell carcinoma has not yet been established because of the overall extremely poor prognosis regardless of the mode of treatment. The role of esophagectomy has been controversial in the management of patients with this disease. Methods The clinicopathologic characteristics of 13 patients with primary esophageal small cell carcinoma were retrospectively studied and the prognostic significance of various factors with respect to esophagectomy were evaluated. Results Lymph node metastases and distant metastases were found at the time of presentation in 92.3 and 46.2%, respectively. Two of nine patients treated by surgical resection for local‐regional disease survived >5 years after radical esophagectomy with a projected 5‐year survival rate of 22.2%. The remaining 4/13 patients were treated by nonsurgical modalities, but died of the disease within 10 months. A significant difference ( P < 0.05) was detected between the survival curves of the two groups of patients. Conclusion Radical esophagectomy may be an effective treatment modality in improving survival and the odds of a cure in patients with local‐regional small cell carcinoma of the esophagus. J. Surg. Oncol. 64:130–134. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.