A quantitative and qualitative reanalysis of the endocast from the juvenile Paranthropus specimen l338y‐6 from Omo, Ethiopia

Based on an analysis of its endocast, Holloway (1981 Am J Phys Anthropol 53 :109–118) attributed the juvenile Omo L338y‐6 specimen to Australopithecus africanus (i.e., gracile australopithecines) rather than to Paranthropus (Australopithecus) boisei (robust australopithecines) favored by other workers (Rak and Howell [1978] Am J Phys Anthropol 48 :345–366). Holloway's attribution was based on the specimen's (1) low cranial capacity, (2) gracile‐like meningeal vessels, (3) gracile‐like cerebellar hemispheres, and (4) absence of an enlarged occipital/marginal (O/M) sinus system. Recent work, however, has shown that criteria 1 and 2 are not useful for sorting gracile from robust australopithecines (Culotta [1999] Science 284:1109–1111; Falk [1993] Am J Phys Anthropol 92 :81–98). In this paper, we test criterion 3 by quantifying the endocranial cerebellar and occipital morphology reproduced on the Omo L338y‐6 endocast, and comparing it to seven endocasts from South and East African early hominids. Our preliminary results show that metric analysis of this specimen cannot be used to sort it preferentially with either robust or gracile australopithecines. Finally, we demonstrate that, contrary to previous reports, the Omo L338y‐6 endocast reproduces an enlarged left occipital sinus (criterion 4). This observation is consistent with the original attribution of the Omo specimen to robust australopithecines (Rak and Howell [1978] Am J Phys Anthropol 48 :345–366). Furthermore, if Omo L338y‐6 was a robust australopithecine, this discovery extends the occurrence of an enlarged O/M sinus system to one of the earliest known paranthropines. Am J Phys Anthropol 110:399–406, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.