z-logo
Premium
Life history of Eulemur fulvus rufus From 1988–1998 in Southeastern Madagascar
Author(s) -
Overdorff Deborah J.,
Merenlender Adina M.,
Talata Pierre,
Telo Albert,
Forward Zoe A.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
american journal of physical anthropology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.146
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1096-8644
pISSN - 0002-9483
DOI - 10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(199903)108:3<295::aid-ajpa5>3.0.co;2-q
Subject(s) - life history , geography , biology , ecology
In this study, we compare the life‐history patterns of male and female Eulemur fulvus rufus based on longitudinal data collected on individuals from two study groups from 1988–1998 in southeastern Madagascar. Mean group size was 9.5 individuals, and groups either contained more adult males than females or equal numbers of both sexes. Females reproduced for the first time between 2 and 4 years of age and reproduced each year, although the mean interbirth interval between surviving offspring was 2.1 years. An average of two adult females reproduced annually in each social group, and age and body weight may positively influence reproductive success. Females also appear to be philopatric but not female‐bonded. Young natal males immigrated between 3 and 4.5 years of age and may join a new group within 6–12 months based on the age of emigrants. Once in a social group, they remained until old age, although a male's spatial position in the social group varied with age. Young nonnatal males were members of the social core and had the first opportunity to mate with all estrous females. Older males were peripheral to the social group and mated with females later in their cycle. We hypothesize that group size, the number of females in the group, and individual variation in reproductive success is influenced by several ecological conditions at this site: extreme variability in food availability during reproductive periods, the lack of large food patches, low plant species diversity, and small numbers of important aseasonal food sources such as Ficus species. Am J Phys Anthropol 108:295–310, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here