Comparison of Letermovir Versus Ganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

ABSTRACT Background Patients at high risk for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) should receive CMV prophylaxis. Historically, ganciclovir has been the preferred agent. However, its side effect profile, particularly myelosuppression, is undesirable. Letermovir is a newer agent that is not myelosuppressive and has replaced ganciclovir as the preferred agent for CMV prophylaxis in high‐risk adult patients. Methods The primary objective was to compare the incidence of dose modifications or discontinuation of CMV prophylaxis between pediatric patients who received ganciclovir versus letermovir. Secondary objectives included comparing the use of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) support and the incidence of CMV DNAemia. We reviewed records of all pediatric patients who received an HCT at our institution between 2000 and 2024 and received either ganciclovir/valganciclovir or letermovir for CMV prophylaxis. Results Between 2000 and 2024, 65 pediatric patients receiving prophylactic ganciclovir, valganciclovir, or letermovir were evaluated. The median age at transplant was 12.2 years. No patients receiving letermovir required dose modification or discontinuation as opposed to 14 (29.2%) patients receiving ganciclovir ( p = 0.014). After engraftment, 12 (25%) patients receiving ganciclovir required G‐CSF support compared to seven (41.2%) patients receiving letermovir ( p = 0.23). In the ganciclovir group, 10 (20.8%) patients experienced CMV infection versus one (5.9%) patient receiving letermovir ( p = 0.26). Conclusion Compared with those receiving letermovir, a significantly higher proportion of patients in the ganciclovir/valganciclovir group experienced dose modifications or discontinuation of CMV prophylaxis due to adverse effects. Letermovir shows great promise as a CMV prophylactic agent in pediatric HCT patients due to its favorable side effect profile.