z-logo
Premium
Rapid quantitative MRI at 46 mT : Accelerated T 1 and T 2 mapping with low‐rank reconstructions
Author(s) -
Dong Yiming,
Najac Chloé,
Osch Matthias J. P.,
Webb Andrew,
Börnert Peter,
Lena Beatrice
Publication year - 2025
Publication title -
magnetic resonance in medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.696
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1522-2594
pISSN - 0740-3194
DOI - 10.1002/mrm.30442
Subject(s) - undersampling , imaging phantom , algorithm , scanner , computer science , compressed sensing , nuclear medicine , physics , mathematics , artificial intelligence , medicine
Abstract Purpose To evaluate accelerated T 1 ‐ and T 2 ‐mapping techniques for ultra–low‐field MRI using low‐rank reconstruction methods. Methods Two low‐rank–based algorithms, image‐based locally low‐rank (LLR) and k‐space–based structured low‐rank (SLR), were implemented to accelerate T 1 and T 2 mapping on a 46 mT Halbach MRI scanner. Data were acquired with 3D turbo spin‐echo sequences using variable‐density poisson‐disk random sampling patterns. For validation, phantom and in vivo experiments were performed on six healthy volunteers to compare the obtained values with literature and to study reconstruction performance at different undersampling factors and spatial resolutions. In addition, the reconstruction performance of the LLR and SLR algorithms for T 1 mapping was compared using retrospective undersampling datasets. Total scan times were reduced from 45/38 min (R = 1) to 23/19 min (R = 2) and 11/9 min (R = 4) for a 2.5 × 2.5 × 5 mm 3 resolution, and to 18/16 min (R = 4) for a higher in‐plane resolution 1.5 × 1.5 × 5 mm 3 for T 1 /T 2 mapping, respectively. Results Both LLR and SLR algorithms successfully reconstructed T 1 and T 2 maps from undersampled data, significantly reducing scan times and eliminating undersampling artifacts. Phantom validation showed that consistent T 1 and T 2 values were obtained at different undersampling factors up to R = 4. For in vivo experiments, comparable image quality and estimated T 1 and T 2 values were obtained for fully sampled and undersampled (R = 4) reconstructions, both of which were in line with the literature values. Conclusions The use of low‐rank reconstruction allows significant acceleration of T 1 and T 2 mapping in low‐field MRI while maintaining image quality.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here