Premium
Courts may uphold fundamental alteration determinations in face of waning OCR influence
Author(s) -
Masinter Michael R.
Publication year - 2025
Publication title -
disability compliance for higher education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1943-8001
pISSN - 1086-1335
DOI - 10.1002/dhe.31978
Should the dismantling of the Office for Civil Rights continue, students who can retain private or pro bono counsel may resort to litigation rather than OCR complaints to contest the denial of academic accommodations. The recent Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Albert v. Association of Certified Anti‐Money Laundering Specialists, LLC may foreshadow a more liberal approach to upholding fundamental alteration determinations.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom